참고문헌
독일의 정당해산심판
1. 인용 판례 케이스 Cases
독일판례
l 1952년극우나치 SRP 정당해산 BVerfGE 2, 1
l 1956년독일공산당 KPD 정당해산 BVerfGE 5, 85
l 1997년극우단체 National List 해산BverfGE 91, 262
l 1997년극우단체자유독일노동자당(FDA) 해산BVerfGE 91, 276
l 2003년극우신나치 NPD 정당해산 BVerfGE 107, 339
l 공산당지지자동맹 Communist Voters’ League 사건 BVerfGE 16, 4 (1963)
l BVerfGE 1, 208 (1952)
l BVerfGE 20, 56 (1966)
l BVerfGE 24, 260 (1968)
l BVerfGE 39, 334 (1974)
l BVerfGE 40, 287 (1975)
l BVerfGE 47, 198 (1978)
l BVerfGE 51, 222 (1979)
l BverfGE 91, 262 (1994)
유럽인권재판소 판례
l Vogt v. Germany (Applciaiton no.17851/91) 1995.9.26 선고
2. 참고문헌
한국어
송석윤, “정당해산심판의 실체적 요건: 정당해산심판제도의 좌표와 관련하여”, 서울대학교 법학, 51권1호(2010), 27-65.
송석윤, “독일 헌법상 정당조항과 그 한국적 이식”, 서울대학교 법학 41권3호(2000)
헌법재판소, “기본권 영역별 위헌심사의 기준과 방법”, 110-143. (2008)
헌법재판소, “정당해산심판 제도에 관한 연구”, (2004)
헌법재판소, “헌법재판 실무 제요”, (2008).
허영, “헌법소송법론”, 박영사 제9판 (2014)
김성준, 기본적 인권 및 자유의 국제적 해석-유럽인권법원 판례를 중심으로-, 연경문화사 (2013)
이강국 헌법재판소장 퇴임 기념 논문집 간행위원회, “헌법재판의 새로운 지평”, 박영사 (2013)
일본어
カトウカズヒコ, “NPD違憲政党訴訟と憲法裁判”, 現代法学(東京経済大学現代法学会誌,)(2005), http://repository.tku.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/11150/337/1/genhou10-06.pdf
國吉孝志, “ドイツ連邦共和国における政党国家論: 「戦闘的民主主義」と政党の違憲問題,” 九州国際大学大学院法政論集第11号 (2009) http://www.kiu.ac.jp/organization/library/memoir/img/pdf/hosei-11-004kuniyoshi.pdf
樋口陽一, 自由な民主的基本秩序の保障と政党の禁止-ドイツ共産党(KPD)違憲判決,ドイツ憲法判例研究会編, ‘ドイツの憲法判例”, 信山社, 2판, 2003
小野善康,日本國憲法と政黨, 50 Artes Liberales (1992)
井口文男 “憲法と民主制”,岡山大學法學會雜誌巻53号3-4 (2004.3.)
上脇博之, “政黨國家論と國民代表論の憲法問題”, 日本評論
社, 2005.
上脇博之, 「政党の憲法上の地位」論再論, 『神戸学院法学』34巻1号(2004年), http://www.law.kobegakuin.ac.jp/~jura/hogaku/34-1/34-1-02.pdf
植松健一, 「諜報機関による議員監視と『たたかう民主制』―ラーメロウ事件を素材として」, 島大法学 55/ 1 (2011), http://ir.lib.shimane-u.ac.jp/bull/bull.pl?id=7269
石村修, “ドイツ基本法60年と「たたかう民主主義”, http://www.gendainoriron.net/op6ishimura.html.
山野一美, “ドイツにおける政治的意見の自由とその限界(1-3)”, 一橋論叢65권1호
佐藤昌盛, “西ドイツ戦う民主主義”, PHP研究所、1979
水島朝穂, “ボン基本法における『自由な民主主義基本秩序”, 早稲田法学29巻 (1978) http://dspace.wul.waseda.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2065/6367/1/A05111951-00-029000315.pdf
山岸喜久治, “ドイツの憲法忠誠戦後から統一まで, SBC学術文庫, 1998.
독일어
Andersen, Handwörterbuch des politischen Systems der Bundesrepublik Deutschland.5., aktual. Aufl. 2003.
Backes, Politischer Extremismus in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, 3 Bde. 1989
Böckenförde, Extremisten im öffentlichen Dienst, 1981
Denninger, Verfassungstreue und Schutz der Verfassung, in: VVDStRL 37. 1979
Denninger, "Streitbare Demokratie" und Schutz der Verfassung, 1994
Jesse, “Streitbare Demokratie: Theorie, Praxis und Herausforderungen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland”, 1981
Thiel, Wehrhafte Demokratie. Beiträge über die Regelungen zum Schutze der freiheitlichen demokratischen Grundordnung. Tübingen 2003.
Weckenbrock: Die streitbare Demokratie auf dem Prüfstand. Die neue NPD als Herausforderung. Bonn 2009.
Zirn, Das Parteiverbot nach Art.21 Abs. 2 GG im Rahmen der streitbaren Demokratie des GG. Diss. Tübingen. 1988
영어
Akbulut O., Criteria Developed by the European Court of Human Rights on the Dissolution of Political Parties, 34 (2010) Fordham International Law Journal, http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2281&context=ilj.
Berton P, “The Japanese Party System”, Westview Press (1992)
Bickel, “Democracy functions not merely as a sharer of power, but as a genenator of consent.”
Bingham, “The Rule of Law”, Penguin, 2011.
Bligh G., “Defending Democracy: A New Understanding of the Party-Banning Phenomenon”,
Bourne, A. K., “Democratisation and the Illegalisation of Political Parties in Europe”, Working Paper Series on the Legal Regulation of Political Parties, No. 7. (2011) http://www.partylaw.leidenuniv.nl/uploads/wp0711.pdf
Breyer S, Constitutionalism, Privatization, and Globalization: Changing Relationships Among European Constitutional Courts, 21 Cardozo L. Rev. 1045.
Brugger W., “The Treatment of Hate Speech in German Constitutional
Law (Part I)”,
Capoccia G., “Militant Democracy: The Institutional Bases of Democratic Self-Preservation”, Annu.Rev.Law Soc. Sci 2013.9:207-26 , http://users.ox.ac.uk/~ssfc0073/Writings%20pdf/Capoccia%20ARLSS%202013.pdf
Capoccia G., “Democratic Militancy and Democratic Rule: Party ban in Western Europe”, http://www.ptesc.ssc.upenn.edu/Paper_pdf/Capoccia%20part%201.html?action=show&person=125.
Capoccia, G., “Defending Democracy: Reactions to Political Extremism in interwar Europe”, European Journal of Political Research, 39. (2001)
Cohen, J., "Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy" In A. Hamlin and P. Petit (eds.), The Good Polity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989, at 17-21.
Eley, Forging Democracy: The History of the Left in Europe, 1850-2000, Oxford University Press, 2002.
Franz P, Unconstitutional and Outlawed Political Parties: A German-American Comparison, 5 B.C. Intl & Comp.L.Rev. 51(1982), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/iclr/vol5/iss1/3.
Hanschmann, F, Another Test in Procedural Democracy: The Oral Proceedings in the NPD Party Ban case before the Federal Constitutional Court”, German Law Journal 3/11 (2002, 11,1), available at http://www.germanlawjournal.com/article.php?id=204.
Hanschmann, F, Federal Constitutional Court To Review NPD Party Ban Motion, 2 German Law Journal (2001), http://www.germanlawjournal.com/index.php?pageID=11&artID=104.
Issacharoff S., “Fragile Democracies”, 120 Harvard Law Review 6 (2007).
Karvonen, L., “Legislation on Political Parties: A Global Comparison”, Party Politics, 13 (200&).
Kommers & Miller, “The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany” (3 ed.), Duke University Press (2012).
Lachmayer* K., “Constitutional Reasoning as Legitimacy of Constitutional Comparison”,
Lincoln, Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, vol. 5, Rutgers University Press (1990).
Loewenstein K, Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights, 31 The American Political Science Review 3 (1937).
Maus D, Application of the case law of Foreign Courts and Dialogue between Constitutional Courts,
Molenaar F, “The Development of European Standards on Political Parties and their Regulation”, (2010), http://www.partylaw.leidenuniv.nl/uploads/wp0410.pdf.
Muller F, “Report-Bundesverfassungsgericht, FCC)-2003” in Annual of German & European Law-2004, eds Miller & Zumbansen 2006.
Popelier (eds), “The role of constitutional courts in multilevel governance”, Intersentia, UK, 2012.
Rawls, J. A. Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, 1971.
Rensmann T, Procedural Fairness in a Militant Democracy: The "Uprising of the Decent" Fails Before the Federal Constitutional Court, 4 German Law Journal 1117-1136 (2003), available athttp://www.germanlawjournal.com/index.php?pageID=11&artID=332.
Ristroph A, “Is Law? Constitutional Crisis and Existential Anxiety”, 25 Const. Comment 431 (2008-2009), at 439-444. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1473968.
Staudt N., “The Judicial Power of the Purse: How Courts Fund
National Defense in Times of Crisis (An Introduction)”
Thuston T., “The military’s role in domestic terrorism”, https://www.hsdl.org/?view&doc=87897&coll=limited.
Trönnberg F., “State Regulation of Anti-Democratic Parties-A Comparative Study of Germany, Spain and Sweden”,
Waldron, “Is the Rule of Law an Essentially Contested Concept (in Florida)”, (2002) 21 Law and Philosophy 137-164.
Waldron, J. Law and Disagreement, Oxford University Press, 1999.
Waldron, J. The Dignity of Legislation, Cambridge University Press, 1999
Waldron, J. Normative (or Ethical) Positivism. In: Coleman, Jules (Ed.). Hart’s Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to The Concept of Law, Oxford University Press, 2001.
Waller & Fennema, “Communist parties in Western Europe: decline or adaptation”, Blackwell, 1988.
베니스위원회, Guidelines on prohibition and dissolution of political parties and analogous measures, http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/CDL-INF(2000)001-e.aspx.
베니스위원회, “Guidelines on political party regulation,” http://www.osce.org/odihr/77812?download=true.
http://www.kas.de/wf/doc/kas_31446-1522-2-30.pdf?120627031511.
CFMHA, “Military Operations Other Than War”, http://www.cdmha.org/toolkit/cdmha-rltk/PUBLICATIONS/j7-mootw.pdf.
ODIHR OSCE, „Preventing and responding to hate crimes. A resource guide for NGOs in the OSCE region“, 2009. http://www.osce.org/odihr/39821?download=true
Lord Kerr at the Lord MacDermott Lecture Human Rights Law and the 'War on Terror', Queen's University, Belfast
3. 관련기관 법정보 웹사이트
한국 헌법재판소 www.ccourt.go.kr/.
한국 법제연구원 www.klri.re.kr/kor/main.do
베니스 위원회 www.venice.coe.int.
유럽인권재판소 www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home
독일 연방헌법재판소 www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/
독일 연방헌법보호청 www.verfassungsschutz.de/
독일 연방공화국기본법 Grundgesetz www.bundestag.de/bundestag/aufgaben/rechtsgrundlagen/grundgesetz/gg.html.
독일 헌법 독일어 원문 www.gesetze-im-internet.de/gg/index.html
독일 헌법 영어 번역본 www.iuscomp.org/gla/statutes/GG.htm
독일 헌법 일본어 번역 www.fitweb.or.jp/~nkgw/dgg/index.htm
독일 정당법 영어 번역www.bundestag.de/htdocs_e/documents/legal/politicalparties.pdf
독일법 영어 논문 www.germanlawjournal.com/
The Juristisches Internetprojekt Saarbrücken.
Bundesverfassungsgericht http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/entscheidungen.html
Entscheidungen des Bundesgerichtshofs.- civil and criminal decisions Bundesgerichtshof.
http://www.bundesgerichtshof.de/DE/Home/home_node.html
Entscheidungen des Bundesarbeitsgerichts.
http://juris.bundesarbeitsgericht.de/cgi-bin/rechtsprechung/list.py?Gericht=bag&Art=en
Entscheidungen des Bundesverwaltungsgerichts-Federal Administrative Law Court http://www.bverwg.de/
'정당 해산 심판' 카테고리의 다른 글
독일 연방헌법재판소 NPD정당 해산 심판 판결요지 (1) | 2025.05.02 |
---|---|
생각하기의 중요성 (1) | 2025.05.02 |
해직교사 판결문 (0) | 2025.05.02 |
해직 교사 유럽인권재판소 케이스 (1) | 2025.05.02 |
터키 공산당 사건 (0) | 2025.05.02 |