1. 영문초록
“秺侯” (Toohoo) in the tombstone of King Moonmoo of 682 year is not Kim Il-je, but “Sanggu Sung”.
In this essay, it is proposed that “秺侯” (Toohoo) in the tombstone of King Moonmoo is “商丘成” (Sanggu Sung) from the Dongyi tribe, not Kim Il-je (金日磾) from the Xiongnu tribe. Up until now, many argue that the Toohoo was interpreted as Kim Il-je, who was born as the prince of the Xiongnu tribe and defected to the Han Dynasty, but this essay proposes that Toohoo is “商丘成”(Sanggu Sung).
In addition, it is proposed that the toohoo of “秺侯之忠孝淳深” in “Seojeongbu” was not “Kim Il-je but “Sanggu Sung”.
In this way through textual interpretation, it is refuted the hypothesis that “Silla was descended from the Xiongnu”. It is a historical fact that the Silla Kingdom was descended from the Dongyi tribe of the Shang dynasty.
Although the “Sanggu Sung” is recorded in the Han Shu(漢書) and Jachitonggam(資治通鑑), and in the 1716 year published Dictionary of Kang Hui shown as “【史記•年表】秺侯金日磾【前漢•功臣表】秺侯商丘成”, there is no article yet to put forward Sanggu Sung for consideration.
It is hoped that this essay will open up a new horizon in Korean history and serve as a groundbreaking study that provides a new turning point in the study of the origins of Korean history.
주제어
金日磾, 문무대왕, 문무왕릉비, 반악, 商丘成, 서정부, 秺侯(투후)
'문무대왕릉비 연구-제3권-투후는 누구인가' 카테고리의 다른 글
서정부에서 열거한 인물 리스트 (4) | 2025.04.14 |
---|---|
국문초록 (0) | 2025.04.14 |
장건과 소무를 같이 한 묶음으로써 거명한 이유 (0) | 2025.04.14 |
투후와 육가를 같이 한 묶음으로서 거명한 이유 (0) | 2025.04.14 |
被髮左袵 奮迅泥滓(피발좌임 분신니재) 해석 (0) | 2025.04.14 |